• PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    My parents are lifelong Democrats. When I ask them questions about any specific policy, they are vehemently against if it involves raising taxes even slightly. Voting Democrat makes them feel better about themselves. They always ask me to fill their ballots in, I have to refuse and lecture them every time. They love CNN.

  • bassomitron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    124
    arrow-down
    55
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Don’t remember the last time the Democrats had military storming our streets and black bagging US residents en masse and deporting them to war zones like South Sudan or Libya despite those people having zero ties to those countries.

    This reeks of fucking shitpost right-wing propaganda.

    Edit: here come all the “but the US/CIA did all this fucked up stuff to other countries under Dems, too!”

    JFC, the current “president” who is GOP literally yells about wanting to deport/arrest political opponents, censor TV personalities (e.g. Colbert, Fallon, etc), openly calls to suppress political opposition in voting, openly supports ignoring the courts when they interfere with his blatantly unconstitutional actions, etc etc .

    Yes, the Dems aren’t fucking innocent, but to pretend they’re the same as a party that’s openly trying to “take back the Nazi word” is fucking insane.

    • Kultronx@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      lmfao you americans are ignorant of your own history. do you honestly think ICE disappeared when Biden was in power? no it’s because people like Harris and their bootlickers like you were fine with it when the Top Cop was doing it, they were deporting in record numbers. i guess the black sites also disappeared too, right? typical american arrogance unable to see beyond party affiliation, they are all the same demon to us non-americans, the dems are just better at hiding it. you are the right winger_

    • Zerush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The problem is that both parties are right wings, only one somewhat more extreme. Both defends the rights of big corporations, billonairs and less or nothing those of the rest of the people. Public services, labor rights and even basic rights, like health and education are a bad joke in the US and only available if you have money. Now with Trump it goes even worse.

    • OrteilGenou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      They’re not the same. The Dems stand back and shake their fist/wring their hands when the Repubs have power and run roughshod over them. Then when the Dems have power they allow their efforts to be thwarted by the Repubs and gesture helplessly when in fact they could just push things through themselves.

      Also the DNC is a malfunctioning toilet that costs elections, implying that they think it’s better to have a pro-establishment Repub in power than a Dem maverick.

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      war zones like South Sudan or Libya despite those people having zero ties to those countries.

      Damn I wonder why Libya is like that!

      You absolute ghouls literally don’t see foreigners as human

      • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I dont think there is a lib alive who remembers the dems role in the destruction of Libya other than those directly involved in it.

      • vfreire85@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        since the end of ww2 the two major coup d’états in brazil happened with direct support of the department of state and the cia under dem administration (johnson was in power in 64 and obama, with hillary clinton in charge of the department of state, in 2016). we’ve got a story or two to tell about them. if the regular lib doesn’t care about that, then the most natural thing for us is to consider both parties equally harmful and don’t give a damn over internal issues of the us and a.

    • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Off the top off my head the national guard during the george floyd protest that got called in by tim walz. Even trump was “impressed”

          • bassomitron@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            People had literally burned down police stations and mass looting was occurring. Their police force was completely overrun. Don’t act like it was remotely the same thing.

            I have several friends in Minneapolis that are very progressive. There were tons of people who were legit scared during periods of that for numerous reasons. It wasn’t “acceptable,” but what the fuck else do you do when law and order begins to completely breakdown?

            • Saleh@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Maybe reform the law and order that regularly lets Police murder citizens because they feel like it?

              You know, how the protestors demanded before their peaceful protest got beaten up in order to escalate violence to deligitimize the demands and present the violent police as necessary.

              • bassomitron@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                15 hours ago

                I don’t disagree. I was simply providing context, which the other comment I responded to wasn’t addressing.

            • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              13 hours ago

              It wasn’t “acceptable,” but what the fuck else do you do when law and order begins to completely breakdown?

              if it isn’t acceptable it isn’t acceptable period. “this was the only way” literally means that you think it was acceptable.

              • bassomitron@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                I put it in quotes because I wasn’t meaning it to be so exact.

                But whatever, I’m done arguing with enlightened centrists.

                • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 hours ago

                  So you do think the kidnapping off the streets into unmarked vans by the military was somewhat acceptable when the democrats called for it? At least have the gut to come out and say it

    • SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      the Democrats had military storming our streets and black bagging US residents en masse

      The Posse Comitatus Act is what generally prevents military from “black bagging US residents” and leaves that job to police.

      Texas was the first state to allow for the national guard to assist in immigration efforts back in 2021. Democrats did nothing to stop, delay or prevent the expansion of those powers which were further pushed and nationalized in 2025.

      The other loophole is invoking the insurrection act. While Biden did not involve it it was repeatedly threatened during the Gaza war protests, however the protests never got too riotous for the Dems to risk damaging their image and the local police were perfectly capable of documenting and black bagging people for it.

      The cases of Kahlil and Mahdawi where Trump attended to deport individuals participating in those protests was made possible by the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952. That specific bill was introduced by the Democrats, passed the Democratic majority House and Senate, Vetoed by Democratic president Truman before being overridden by the house/Senate.

      You are correct that they are “not the same”, but stating that the shield of your enemy is your friend, just because it isn’t a sword is fucking insane.

      • piefood@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Yeah, wouldn’t want to consume any true, but politically inconvenient posts
        /s

      • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Everything except complete submission to the US State department reeks of Russian propaganda to .worlders

  • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Democrats

    • Retain marriage rights for gay couples.

    • Expand legality of recreational drugs.

    • Free food for schoolchildren.

    • Tax credits for families with children.

    • Subsidized for free childcare.

    • Expand electric car charging nationally.

    • Subsidize sustainable fuel sources.

    • Fact based education standards.

    • Stop racism in policing.

    • Expanded healthcare subsidies.

    • Preserve democracy.

    Republicans

    • Being gay or trans should be illegal.

    • White supremacy is great!

    • Christianity as national religion.

    • Privatize the post office and weather service.

    *Eliminate the EPA, Department of Education.

    • Defund IRS.

    • Disenfranchise nonwhites and women.

    • Antivax agenda.

    • Expand fossil fuel use.

    • Eliminate worker safety laws.

    • Eliminate collective bargaining and union rights.

    • Defunding science research.

    • Deregulate crypto.

    • No regulations on AI.

    • No recognition of child’s educational or bodily autonomy rights.

    • Eliminate hate crime laws except for straight white men.

    • End democracy, install fascist dictatorship.

    But yeah, they are totally the same, right guys? RIGHT!?!

    • piefood@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I think you dropped this:

      Democrats & Republicans

      • Bombed kids
      • Tortured innocent people
      • Increased the surveillance state
      • Took money from the poor and working class, and gave it to their rich friends
      • Spent billions on wars, while claiming that they couldn’t afford to fix our healthcare or housing problems
      • Boasted about deporting more people than Republicans
      • Backed a Genocide
    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      You’ve certainly whitewashed Dems quite a lot. You’re fundamentally not wrong though. As bad as the Dems are, and they are very bad, MAGA is undeniably worse. If we had some other electoral system, we could safely explore other options. But we don’t. We have FPTP, which makes it a binary choice between bad and worse.

      And worse is just so, so much worse. That doesn’t make bad good, but it’s still a binary choice. You’d have to be evil or stupid to try to muddy the waters so that bad seems close enough to worse that people don’t feel the urgency of choosing bad to prevent worse.

      • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        The lesser evil choice is whichever hastens the collapse of your monstrous, genocidal empire

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Dems can be convinced to try other election systems besides FPTP because they fundamentally believe in democracy. From my perspective, fixing things without violence is still an option with Dems. It isn’t with Republicans.

        • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          because they fundamentally believe in democracy.

          Westerners will go on and on about how North Koreans are brainwashed to worship their leaders, then say shit like this.

          fixing things without violence

          Apparently doing the modern holocaust doesn’t’ count as “violence” to white supremacist BlueMAGA fascists.

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m hoping Musk gets some momentum with his third party. Either it splits the Republican vote and slows down this freefall into fascism, or he dumps tons of resources into promoting some variety of RCV. Either way, that’s a net benefit in my eyes.

    • TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      71
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      Fact based education standards.

      Teaching a bunch of lies about American exceptionalism and how imperialism is actually good isn’t what I’d call “fact based”

      Stop racism in policing

      Right like how democrats in nearly all major cities increased police funding and almost none passed any meaningful reform.

      Expanded healthcare subsidies

      But don’t remotely consider universal healthcare

      Preserve democracy

      Preserve the status quo which I wouldn’t call a democracy. A democracy enacts the will of the people, democrats don’t even have a democratic primary for their own party.

    • Zerush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Well, Democrats are the less evil choice, but all this is peanuts compared to EU social standard, I see here in Spain often US tourists which thinks they are in the future, IN SPAIN, with the rights, services and the freedom people has. Even with the US Democrates, it’s compared like the EU fifty years ago.

    • only_in_ohio@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Those memes are just contributing to the issue of young people skipping the elections, and then complaining about our leaders being stupid

      • piefood@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Well, then maybe the Democrats should fix that, by putting out candidates that young people actually want to vote for.

      • Zerush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        No, even the US has more parties than only those two. In Spain we also had a two party system a lot of years ago, but this changed when the people begone to vote also for other parties than those two, with this we have now several different parties, that makes that there have to create aliances to obtain the mayority do be able to govern, so corresponding more on the reallity of the needs of the people, out of this black and white scheme (or better bright and dark grey). In the US is needed that also enter left wing parties, which represent the basic rights of the people, which currently don’t exist, because they are “anti-american communists”, this is the mantra with which they create the fear in the people to vote it.

  • shrugs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Change my mind

    Capitalism is a tool to maximize profit. Whoever thought it was a good idea to let capitalism have influence on laws so that they can maximize its profit was a big fool.

    What do you expect? Capitalism, a tool, has by definition no morale. Let it decide politics to increase profit and you end up with that kind of shit society we have today.

    Don’t blame the hammer, when you hit your thumb. Also, don’t let the hammer decide where to make the biggest dent.

    Can we please start again focusing on the people? Without people there is no society, and there is no market to increase profits.

    Start using capitalism and free markets like a tool. Want more renewable and clean energy? Make rules and see the magic of capitalism in making the best out of it.

    Instead we let capitalism decide what should be done next and suffer the consequences. It’s as easy as that.

    Unfortunately capitalism not only create the rules, they also decide what is news and influence societies views. And that’s why OPs picture is as it is.

    Fuck socialism, am I right guys?!

    • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I agree with this 100%.

      Capitalism is exceptional at finding ways to provide value when there is a new market. The issue comes when capital gets accumulated and concentrated in the hands of a few.

      We’ve seen it dozens of times throughout history where a healthy merchant class with lots of opportunity for upwards mobility ends up in an oligarchy as the market becomes saturated then monopolies, duopolies, and cabals (guilds) form.

      The state needs to use the “P” and “L” in PESTEL forces (Political, Economical, Social, Technological, Environmental, Legal) that businesses (from single to large multinational) to identify new markets that need investment.

      An examples would be new clean renewable electricity and one way of giving preferrence to this green energy by minimally taxing profts on this energy sold in the national market or international market via grid-interconnect networks (“Gridternets” if you will) with a clear plan to increase the tax to a normalised amount slowly overtime as the green share of the market approaches 100%.

      It also has to be used to more aggressively dissuade markets that are more harmful than good now. An example of this is dirty power.

      Coal, Oil, and Gas have done wonders for increasing people’s quality of life because they unlocked a new energy density previously unattainable. Now we have alternatives that are by every metric better; more efficient and less polluting.

      Therefore, these industries need to be taxed out of existence by using a logarithmic energy carbon tax that keeps increasing year on year. Corruption needs to be rooted out like a weed as much as possible using a politically independent organ of the state to keep it healthy.

      Then there’s markets that are stagnant in some state of capture: crumbling infrastructure, food retailer hypermarkets, etc. Windfall suprise taxes on incumbents and grants / zero interest loans for new competitors would reignight competition in those markets and the additional tax revenue can be used to fix the crumbling infrastructure these markets rely on.

      And finally, I’d like to see a strong preference for co-operatives where ownership in a free market is much more evenly distributed by making them the least taxed commercial entities with businesses that have a higher concentration of ownership are taxed more through some sort of profit tax multiplier.

      It’s much harder for a business to act in a pure profit motive to the detriment of society if the employees have more ownership as it allows morality to be expressed through political power within this business. These employees also then benefit from the profit share as well which gives stability and upward mobility in exchange for their labour.

      There, that’s three proposals that could help towards decarbonisation, investing in underfunded infrastructure, and reducing inequality.

      I am not a policy expert and there’s bound to be problems with each of those proposals that I haven’t thought of, but we have so much more to gain by working cooperatively together to build a system that aims to better humanity as a whole by using the best tools correctly and safety.

      Until we reach an energy density which unlocks technology that enables things like a resourceless economy (a la Star Trek luxury space communism), we’re stuck with the tools of money and capital as the ways to transfer value.

      I personally can’t wait for the day where “reputation” rather than money becomes the currency of society, I am willing to work with the tools we have right now to build that future, and I have faith that others are willing to build it with me.

  • yucandu@lemmy.worldBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    Hostility to Russia, Iran & China

    Now we have to guess which country’s propaganda machine is responsible for this post.

    It’s Russia. It’s always Russia.

    • crankyrebel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      We have to have two, to keep the masses fighting, thinking one will bring change the other can’t. It takes the eye off the ball from the oligarchs, industrial war machine, the three rogue letter spy agencies, and most of all the Zionist influence. Brain-dead voters will scream across the isle at each other, “but my candidate is slightly better than your candidate!” Logic has left the room.

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      Except MAGA is not neoliberalism unless we think tariffs are now “free trade”. I get the point that neither party will wield power against capitalism, but they still use their power differently.

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        but they still use their power differently.

        Well…Do they though? On that pesky genocide (sorry I forgot–lets not call it ‘genocide’, right, that makes dems queasy-- how about we just say some people seem to have dropped dead), Bidens pretend “push back” and “negotiations” and “red lines” and “plans to build a dock to get food in and then hand it to the Israelis just like every single other land border crossing” all show that the dem centrists are simply mercenaries paid by zionists. mercenaries who take the time to put up some theatre for their evil so people dont have to acknowledge it, but the exact same outcomes happen either way. Most of the deaths and most of the building demolitions happened under Biden. When you and I start trying to parse if it was slightly faster under Trump, aren’t we missing the point?

        We lost Roe under Biden, who famously never supported a womans right to choose until right before he got tapped to be VP. Strange coincidence?

        Appointing Merrick Garland as AG and then pretending to be powerless while Garland proceeded to lean right and sit on his hands for 4 entire years is another example. As is cracking down on free speech. And what did Biden do in the wake of all the police murders that the defund and reallocate movement brought to his door? He said explicitly that he didnt agree with the massive movement on the left, and shut it down, actually increasing police funding as an extra “eff you” to the dem voters. Same as a republican would. Wheres this imagined difference?

        And Biden famously told rooms full of rich donors at the end of Trumps term that “nothing would fundamentally change” (from Trump’s first term) under him. This emncapsulates this whole discussion perfectly. Biden swearing to the rich that nothing will change, while pretending to run on change.

        This is the same Biden who shut down a rail strike, and then slowly over time negotiated a tiny fraction of what the strikers wanted, and then called it a victory on their behalf-- and then had the effing gall to walk a picket line for a photo op so his surrogates could trumpet how union-friendly he was. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/dec/01/joe-biden-rail-strike-labor-unions

        Same Biden who during his term bragged about being harder on immigration than Trump ever had been-- and wore it like a badge of honor that he’d “closed the southern border”. https://jacobin.com/2024/06/biden-asylum-executive-order-border

        Today centrist dems wont even admit there was ever any problem. So I guess you’d say we should change nothing and ignore the wildly eroding support and the poll numbers showing the democratic party has just 28% favorability?

        • zbyte64@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          So I guess you’d say we should change nothing and ignore the wildly eroding support and the poll numbers showing the democratic party has just 28% favorability?

          My brother in Christ, you’re not talking to a liberal here.

      • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Biden also implemented tariffs to China tho.

        Neoliberalism shouldn’t be seen as a doctrine but as a stage of capitalism, in which policies are shaped by the current context, with the intention of mantaining the current status quo. Free trade made sense for imperialist core countries because its industries were much ahead than the rest of the world, thus free trade made it easier to conquer international markets. Now that China has caught up, free trade fundamentalism is no longer the correct strategy.

  • Octagon9561@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    The fact that there are so many dislikes proves how propagandized the average American is. “How dare you call both sides the same” Well, they ojectively are pretty much the same with few exceptions.

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Especially for non-Usian people, doubly especially for those on the working end of US “diplomacy” - bombs, coups and sanctions come regardless of which US administration, there is literally no difference whatsoever.

    • uniquethrowagay@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      You must be very privileged or very ignorant to see things this way.
      The Democratic Party is somewhat conservative and stand firmly behind capitalism. But they aren’t fascists. Not at all.

    • dxdydz@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I’m no fan of the democrats, but they don’t want to systematically exterminate people like me.

    • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      1 day ago

      One side supports a criminal Nazi apologist who tried to overthrow our Democracy and hasn’t given up yet. The other side brings a knife to the gun fight.

      They’re not even remotely the same. 40 years ago that may have been closer to true.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        The DNC isn’t fighting for workers. They are bringing a gun to the gunfight, they just aren’t interested in using it against the GOP, as ultimately both serve capital. The US has never been a democracy for the people.

        • 𝕛𝕨𝕞-𝕕𝕖𝕧@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          oh god i agree with cowbee wholeheartedly in a thread of discourse…

          oh god oh fuck oh shit i can feel it happening… is it warm in here?

          Я чувствую, как марксизм-ленинизм просачивается в мой мозг!!! make it stop.

          Теперь я чувствую себя белым и пушистым… как коммунистический медведь.

          —-

          anyway joking aside appreciate lemmy collectively telling neolibs to shut the fuck up bc while plenty of things .ml says piss me off, they don’t piss me off nearly as much as seeing americans who haven’t ripped the bandaid off yet.

        • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          1 day ago

          Democrats seek to regulate said capital. The Overton window is too far right to have much effect.

          Serving capital does not mean we’re not a Democracy. Attempting a coup of the government and disinformation does, however.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            They only seek to regulate capital as much as their megacorp and billionaire donors wish. The “Overton Window” has nothing to do with it.

            Further, if both parties serve capital, then we have democracy for capital, not for the people.

            • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from community
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              20 hours ago

              Not much argument there, but the Overton window has everything to do with it. How do you think other Democrat socialist countries got where they were? At some point they were all pretty much in our boat. I haven’t lost hope yet.

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                22
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                19 hours ago

                There are no “democratic socialist” countries. Democratic Socialism is a descriptor for reformist socialism, the closest we got was Salvador Allende in Chile. Socialism isn’t just “social programs,” socialism refers to a mode of production where public ownership is the principle aspect of the economy, ie the large firms and key industries. The Nordic countries are Social Democracies, welfare capitalism essentially.

                The Nordic Countries have the large safety nets they do largely due to proximity with the USSR, who was the first to dramatically expand their safety nets. Combined with millitant labor organizing, these concessions in other countries forced the bourgeoisie’s hand. The problem is that these social safety nets in the global north are funded through imperialism, vast extraction from the global south.

                The Overton Window has nothing to do with it. The system is dominated by capitalists, the only way to get even a fraction of what the workers want is through millitant organizing and running our own parties like PSL, the only way to actually get socialism is through revolution.

                • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  12
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  19 hours ago

                  To most, Democratic Socialism and Social Democracy mean the same thing. Since actual Socialism is usually so irrelevant it requires no clarification. Since you’re an actual socialist I’m gonna doubt we have any constructive dialogue from here on out.

                  But for the record I don’t believe violent revolution is a winning strategy. It’s a failed experiment that killed millions and it won’t work this time either. Neither is sitting back and hoping things work out, so I can’t dock you.

          • Tomorrow_Farewell [any, they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Democrats seek to regulate said capital

            No, they aren’t.

            Serving capital does not mean we’re not a Democracy

            If you think that you live under a democracy, i.e. that your government’s decisions reflect your wishes, then you should be held accountable for the genocides and invasions that your state keeps committing.

            Attempting a coup of the government and disinformation does, however.

            The US suffering a coup would at worst not make anything worse, including in terms of ‘democracy’.

          • KatakiY@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            23 hours ago

            No they want to appear to regulate capital. Most of the time they don’t actually want to regulate it. Yes they won’t be as overt as to do the massive wealth transfers they the republicans do . But they will. Who was president in 08 ? Who continued to dump money into our military contracts despite running as anti war?

            Like yeah the parties are different domestically but foreign policy wise the outcomes are usually the same.

            • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from community
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Most right wing policies done by Democrats are necessary because of the electoral college. There is resistance from the right, and Democrats working within the unfair rules need to appease these swing state voters through compromise. Those compromises are ugly and unfair. It’s not usually because they want to appease billionaires. But definitely there is corruption on both sides. Just 10x as much on the right.

              • SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                21 hours ago

                How did you quantity that 10x times?

                My best naïve estimate puts Democrats at 1.44-1.98x as corrupt.

                • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  21 hours ago

                  😂 I mean for one, the entire presidential election was purchased by a few rich people who used disinformation tactics. Then taxes for the rich were eradicated at the expense of everyone else. That’s the exact opposite of the Democrat’s political ideology. I should say 1000x. I’ll call it “orders of magnitude” instead.

                  So where did you get 1.98?

              • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                18 hours ago

                these swing state voters through compromise. Those compromises are ugly and unfair.

                Unless that compromise is “don’t commit genocide”, then they’ll happily abaondon the swing-state voters.

      • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        One side supports a criminal Nazi apologist who tried to overthrow our Democracy and hasn’t given up yet.

        And the other side commits genocide. It also overthrows other people’s democracy, but you don’t consider foreigners human.

        • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          21 hours ago

          https://www.inss.org.il/publication/democrats/

          Most Democrats express greater sympathy for Palestinians. That’s not what I would call “committing genocide”. What I see is Democrat officials expressing support, but powerless against Republicans who do not. That’s not supporting genocide. We’re fighting, but losing.

          • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Most Democrats express greater sympathy for Palestinians. That’s not what I would call “committing genocide”.

            Committing genocide is committing genocide. What the fuck is wrong with you?

            What I see is Democrat officials expressing support, but powerless against Republicans who do not.

            Then you had your eyes closed for all of 2024

            That’s not supporting genocide. We’re fighting, but losing.

            Genocide denier

              • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                20 hours ago

                Ok, I’ll return your argument strategy exactly as you stated it: [Some thing that in no way resembles anything I said]

                You people really cannot behave in good faith, can you?

                If not, you are a genocide denier and had your eyes closed for all of 2025. What the fuck is wrong with you? You shameful asshole. People are dying and you don’t even give a fuck. You have nothing more to say that I care about until you personally feed an affected person. Hypocrite."

                Incoherent. But I guess I shouldn’t expect more from a genocide apologist fuck like you.

            • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from community
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              21 hours ago

              They did. They were all pardoned by Trump. Trump would have been sent to prison if he didn’t win the election. Our Democracy is working, it reflects the idiocy of over half our population who voted for everyone to jump off a cliff.

              When I walk around, over half the people I talk to support Trump. The other half is actively fighting against it. That’s not support. We’re merely losing.

              • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                20 hours ago

                Trump would have been sent to prison if he didn’t win the election.

                Trump would never have had the chance if Biden elected an AG who didn’t spend 4 years fucking around.

                The other half is actively fighting against it

                Its a shame the democrats dont represent those people and chose not to dismantle Trump’s ICE and instead tried to work with republicans.

            • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from community
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Democrats want to keep funding for Ukraine. Republicans want to remove it. Can you be more specific?

      • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        One side supports a criminal Nazi apologist who tried to overthrow our Democracy and hasn’t given up yet

    • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      1 day ago

      “Everyone who is an adult who realizes there is no unicorn party is completely propagandized. I am le very smart.”

  • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I dunno, no Democrat ever threatened to make my country the 51st state since the 19th century…

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    DNC is a huge problem with America as was Biden/Garland. They need/needed Trump to not fall out of a window, or be in military jail, in order for the most warmongering neocon DNC candidates to ensure warmongering. After Oct 7th, DNC’s Israel first “job is to gaslight the left into supporting Israel”, meant ensuring Trump’s win, and today, have their elected Zionist supremacists, repeat attacks of communism on Mamdani.

    On global warming, forcing a proxy war on Russia, not only enriches domestic oil companies to fund climate denial. pushing global diesel (home heating fuel same fraction) refining capacity to limit, with massive emissions from war, it also means no cooperation with Russia possible on global warming. It is simply impossible to prioritize human sustainability, if voters are made to support war, while struggling with the economic collapse directly accelerated by it, not to mention cultural divisiveness issues (not DNC/Biden fault).

    The US needs either a military coup, or candidates/party that will remove citizenship and assets of Zionist oligarchy influencing US rulership. If money is speech, then money is terrorism.