• Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s not history, but it’s certainly theory. The study it’s based on is through observations of reality. When comparing something to one of these books, we’re testing their observations by comparing them to reality. Incidentally, it gets brought up a lot when an event, occurrence, or vector in society begins to resemble these books too closely.

    Your hyperbole of people quoting books all being nazis, on the other hand, is very easily disproven.

    • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      “this is giving boss baby vibes” except actually trying to make a point out of it

      Your hyperbole of people quoting books all being nazis

      Only the dumbest fucking people pull this shit and you are as fucking stupid as can be measured

        • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Explain to me how you think I’m measuring, fuckwit. You have a judgement on a thing, you should be able to articulate what that thing is, right?

          • Tattorack@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Badly; as someone who is culturally illiterate, lacks the skills of observation to make any determination (whether it be about myself or the subject of the world around us), is incapable of actually making any arguments, and so uses “colourful language” in a juvenile attempt to cover up their shortcomings.

            • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              14 hours ago

              The question I asked you was to explain the method by which I was making a judgement, which you presumed to know.

              Can you answer it, stupid? Or are we going to get another paragraph about how you being snide is supposed to obscure the fact that you can’t maintain a coherent thought throughout one of your posts?

              Mister five subordinate clauses per sentence.

              • Tattorack@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Well, I rest my case. You are a… pointless individual. I do hope you have better luck in real life than on the internet.

                • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  No, you’re a pointless individual because you literally have no point in this argument. I asked you for what your point was and you’ve done nothing but evade and insult. You’re a vapid fucking idiot. See? I can actually stake a position.