fossilesque@mander.xyz to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agothere's no escape! brew another cup!mander.xyzimagemessage-square118linkfedilinkarrow-up11.28Karrow-down114
arrow-up11.26Karrow-down1imagethere's no escape! brew another cup!mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyz to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square118linkfedilink
minus-squareulterno@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·8 hours ago it just had less brackets and <> symbols when they were done. Hence making the parser more inefficient than XML?
minus-squarerumba@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 hours agoIt wasn’t without some advantage. The client hating it didn’t bode well though
minus-squarefloofloof@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2·58 minutes agoThe client hating it just means you’re smarter than them and should press on to help them outgrow their ignorance. It’s a good sign.
Hence making the parser more inefficient than XML?
It wasn’t without some advantage. The client hating it didn’t bode well though
The client hating it just means you’re smarter than them and should press on to help them outgrow their ignorance. It’s a good sign.