• The_Grinch [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      20 hours ago

      It’s definitely gotten more wasteful lately in particularly. You could run 8.1 on any computer that supported Vista, and IME it was even a little snappier, but 10 and 11 have each been significantly worse.

      i3wm on a 32bit IBM thinkpad is still instantaneous-response-fast

      • relativestranger@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        i only recently moved my main home pc from 8.1. there’s configs and software on it that would be difficult or impossible to recreate on a new install or pc. i even have a spare identical mb and cpu in case it’s needed. 1st gen. mechanical disks (several, sata ssd wasn’t that much of an improvement with the old controller for everyday use so i opted to keep the higher capacity) 32gb ram and pascal gpu. i skipped all the way to a rufus’d 11 and it’s actually running well (with all the crud ripped out, though). it dual boots with endless on a loop device. the upgrade didn’t even mess that up.

    • filcuk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I have recently booted into dad’s decade(s?) old xp pc and was baffled by how snappy that thing was…

      • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        XP was snappy at first, but then I used to install a couple of programs and things started to suck big time. It was always the registry. At the time, a lot of people I knew, used to just format Windows on a regular basis, also because the spyware and malware were so prevalent.