Pro@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 8 days agoRustprogramming.devimagemessage-square99linkfedilinkarrow-up1940arrow-down146
arrow-up1894arrow-down1imageRustprogramming.devPro@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 8 days agomessage-square99linkfedilink
minus-squareCroquette@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up8·7 days agoI interface with low level communication protocols, mostly uart, so it fits my use case. But it is nice to see the hurdles people encounters. It tells a lot about the language.
minus-squarebrucethemoose@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-27 days agoYeah. I wasn’t trying to imply it’s a bad language at all; it just fits certain use cases. They are complex, like people. Still, it seems like it’d be cool for engine work, with C# or maybe a subset of typed Python as a scripting language.
I interface with low level communication protocols, mostly uart, so it fits my use case. But it is nice to see the hurdles people encounters. It tells a lot about the language.
Yeah. I wasn’t trying to imply it’s a bad language at all; it just fits certain use cases. They are complex, like people.
Still, it seems like it’d be cool for engine work, with C# or maybe a subset of typed Python as a scripting language.