cm0002@piefed.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agoYou typical Node projectlemmy.mlimagemessage-square68linkfedilinkarrow-up1566arrow-down18
arrow-up1558arrow-down1imageYou typical Node projectlemmy.mlcm0002@piefed.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square68linkfedilink
minus-squareStarvingMartist@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 days agoOff topic but what’s the point of a book that thick other than novelty? Would make much more sense to just separate into volumes
minus-squaredeadbeef79000@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-22 days agoYou get books like that for voluminous stuff like parliament debate transcripts for an entire parliamentary term. They’re generally one-off or only a handful printed and kept as archival records. Almost noone would ever need the physical book, it exists as a physical tome to cite/reference.
minus-squareBJ_and_the_bear@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoSeems like it would break quickly with use
Off topic but what’s the point of a book that thick other than novelty? Would make much more sense to just separate into volumes
You get books like that for voluminous stuff like parliament debate transcripts for an entire parliamentary term.
They’re generally one-off or only a handful printed and kept as archival records.
Almost noone would ever need the physical book, it exists as a physical tome to cite/reference.
Seems like it would break quickly with use