• 0 Posts
  • 8 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 10th, 2024

help-circle


  • balsoft@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mla spectre is haunting NYC
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I think it’s a bit confusing, but in my view almost all socialists (including democratic socialists) are communists since the end goal they are trying to achieve is communism. Socialism (which can be described as welfare state, majority-publicly owned capital, and planned or market-socialist economy) is almost always seen as a stepping stone towards communism (stateless, classless, moneyless society), even though it is would also be an improvement on its own.

    (to confuse matters even further, Lenin’s party was initially called Russian Social-Democratic Labour Party, even though today’s understanding of social-democracy would only apply to the Menshevik wing).






  • Not least because there’s no such thing as a “compiled” or “interpreted” language.

    I’d say there is (but the line is a bit blurry). IMHO the main distinction is the presence (and prevalence) of eval semantics in the language; if it is present, then any “compiler” would have to embed itself into the generated code, thus de-facto turning it into a bundled interpreter.

    That said, the argument that interpreted languages are somehow not programming languages is stupid.