You should be on this meeting already. Why were you losing time looking?

It’s just a matter of cutting and adding some mortar.

People stopped being snobbish about knowing what those words mean about a decade ago. It would be an useful slap on the face of those people back then, but now if it’s useful it’s only for calming down some random person that know what they mean but isn’t confident about it.

They explain it on the beginning of the movie. Max has one of the 2 or 3 cars on the city because he’s a road-cop, fuel is expensive as hell, so they insist he shouldn’t use a lot of it.

The criminals there go from city to city stealing the little fuel they have.

You want Mad Max? Well, better make it happen fast, because there won’t be enough oil for it!

Mad Max is about the end of oil.

The first movie was all with ethanol vehicles, that people converted after oil run out. The second movie is about a group of people that found an old tanker ship, and one pulling oil drop by drop from a dead wheel. The third movie is about people using methane for everything because there was no more oil.

And then the next two are about huge reserves of surface oil all over the place.

Yep, it’s the one starting everything.

And doing nothing else. And still something manages to no be right.

In a great place, the python symbol would be on both sides too. All the other ones are best just left.

Boilerplate unit tests.

It will generate bad tests, so you will have lots of tests blocking your work, but won’t actually test the important properties.

Mass refactoring.

That’s an amount of trust in the LLM capacity to not create hidden corner cases and your capacity to review large-scale changes that… I find your complete faith disturbing.

Failing your local compilation due to linter problems is just stupid.

Sending “temporary” changes into your CI pipeline isn’t even stupid, it’s borderline malicious.

Hum… Ignore linter advice for code that you temporarily mangled.

It’s not like you have to act upon it as soon as a blue line appears under your code.

Firefox does that out of the box.

Gnome used to have a link to your homedir in its settings directory.

I imagine plenty of people had tons of fun with that. But you need to modify rm to follow symlinks nowadays.

Yeah, that site was good before they started rejecting every useful question.

It used to be much better than anything else that came earlier. Nowadays the odds are even that you’ll find your answer on the experts-one.

Python still has the -i option, and it still runs the same language as the files interface.

It’s a scripting language. What means that the computer runs it line by line, without needing to get the entire project first.

not object oriented

I don’t think we have a name for what you are trying to say here.

(And yeah, “object oriented” isn’t it.)

The definition of a script is something the computer executes (if it’s a computer script, of course). Everything else people shove into it is extraneous.

I’m so terrified about it that I check dozens of times before running it. So, no.

But I’m a repeat offender with rm -rf * .o

JS needs to know about styles?

It’s about JS trying to detect if the link was visited, not about style. People used to do that to evade cross-site tracking protection, and this is why JS isn’t allowed to know that anymore.

The one option that is mandated by an ISO standard.

Besides, if max and min are going to have a value without any parameter, it has to be exactly those Javascript uses. Unless you have a type that define other bounds for your numbers. And null always have a pointer type (that is object in Javascript), for the same reason that NaN always have a number type.

The only one that is bad on that list is D.