• Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    38
    ·
    3 days ago

    Wow, “don’t bother voting” agitprop this early? This is going to be a big election!

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      ‘We Have No Coherent Message’: Democrats Struggle to Oppose Trump

      More than 50 interviews with Democratic leaders revealed a party struggling to decide what it believes in, what issues to prioritize and how to confront an aggressive right-wing administration.

      Democrats are self-critical of their inability to take positions distinct from their Republican colleagues without splintering off conservative support? Democrats must be right-wingers.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Its almost like First-past-the-post voting artificially limits the number of viable political parties to two and should be replaced immediately.

        At the very least, you would think democracy advocates in the democratic party would be falling over each other to implement such a much needed reform of our voting systems in the blue states they control. Democrats themselves admit non stop that First-past-the-post voting is a huge problem every election when they screech about the small numbers of 3rd party voters. Democrars publicly admit they know the voting system is broken, yet FPTP remains in use in the vast majority of the country.

        How can you be so upset about a recurring problem and then do nothing to resolve it? There is no excuse. The democrats want to hold your vote hostage and they are using the republican party to threaten you to do it. While they may not be exactly the same as the republicans, they are a part of the problem with our country.

        The democratic party must lose its monopoly on resisting the republicans. We should have a free market of ideas competing with each other. We could have multiple chances to defeat the republicans every election We may one day be free to vote how we want.

        Electoral Reform Videos

        First Past The Post voting (What most states use now)

        Videos on alternative electoral systems

        STAR voting

        Alternative vote

        Ranked Choice voting

        Range Voting

        Single Transferable Vote

        Mixed Member Proportional representation

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          First-past-the-post voting artificially limits the number of viable political parties to two

          Arguably limits viable parties to One. Quite a few states are functionally single party oligarchies, thanks to winner-take-all election results. States that split 55/45 by party affiliation will routinely have legislatures that are closer to 70/30 by representative. And control of statewide office typically means a single party veto even when the legislature is split.

          How can you be so upset about a recurring problem and then do nothing to resolve it?

          It’s a big, systemic problem that requires a large coordinated professionalized opposition to change. And that means organized manpower, large amounts of money/resources, and an ideologically committed media apparatus to help coordinate the reform effort.

          When we’ve got none of the above? And, even worse, an incumbent party system dedicated to resisting any kind of reform (often violently), building that kind of organization is incredibly difficult.

          We should have a free market of ideas competing with each other.

          I can’t imagine how a more fractured and adversarial constellation of movements would benefit us.

          We need a coalition that’s collaborative, not a marketplace of minor opposition parties that’s fighting for vote share.

          The whole appeal of Ranked Choice is that candidates aren’t competing with one another in a market for vote-share. They can collaborate - as Mamdani and Lander did - towards a commonly shared policy goal.

    • admin@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Hey I am kind of centrist ( Center left liberal for people in Europe) , did your good guys release the Epstein file?

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      3 days ago

      This isn’t a centrist meme, it’s a leftist meme. Revolution is necessary, neither party represents worker’s interests.

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah, I’m sure the Democrats will eventually move back to the left of their own accord if we just keep voting for them, keep our heads down, and try not to rock the boat.

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        You forgot donating more money so their analyst friends can make millions explaining how cost of living and support for genocide are not the topics to address, instead focusing on people who love Dick Cheney but think Trump is a bit too far.