ekZepp@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 3 days agoVintagelemmy.worldimagemessage-square318linkfedilinkarrow-up11.31Karrow-down113
arrow-up11.3Karrow-down1imageVintagelemmy.worldekZepp@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square318linkfedilink
minus-squaredarkreader2636@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 days agoIBM sure made naming pretty confusing aren’t they?
minus-squarethe_crotch@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up16·edit-22 days agoPs/2 ports predated the PlayStation 2 by years. Sony made naming confusing in this case.
minus-squareAwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 days agoHow can ports of a game predate the platform itself? That makes zero sense. (/s)
minus-squareRogueJello@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoNot really? I mean it was a whole thing. OS/2, PS/2, I think maybe some PC/2? I can’t remember. Anyway it was all branded together.
minus-squaredosuser123456@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agomissed opportunity for the mainframes to be “system/2” and not “system/360”
IBM sure made naming pretty confusing aren’t they?
Ps/2 ports predated the PlayStation 2 by years. Sony made naming confusing in this case.
How can ports of a game predate the platform itself? That makes zero sense.
(/s)
Not really? I mean it was a whole thing. OS/2, PS/2, I think maybe some PC/2? I can’t remember. Anyway it was all branded together.
missed opportunity for the mainframes to be “system/2” and not “system/360”